Services
Engineering work on your system, with your engineers.
We are brought in when a design decision is expensive to get wrong: a new protocol, a migration, a certification path, a system that has to behave the same way every time. We work on your real specifications and your real code, alongside your team, on a scope agreed before we start. What we leave behind is the reasoning, not only the result.
What you can engage us for
Scope and duration are fixed before we start. Price depends on the component and is quoted in the first conversation.
Specification and verification review
We take one critical component, write down what must be true about it, and tell you which of those claims your current design actually guarantees.
A written specification, every property with its status, and the specific design changes that would make the remaining properties provable.
Verification sprint
We verify an agreed set of properties on an agreed component, in Inference or directly in Rocq, and hand over the proofs together with the code.
Machine-checked proofs, the specification they discharge, and a reviewer's guide so your engineers can extend them.
Embedded verification practice
Our engineers work inside your team on a recurring basis: verification on the current roadmap, review of specifications your engineers write, and the tooling to keep proofs running in your pipeline.
Proofs in your CI, specifications written by your own people, and a practice that outlasts the engagement.
Products are things you install or subscribe to today. Services are engagements where our engineers work on your system alongside your team. The two are connected: the services use the same tools, and the tools exist because of the service work. You can buy either one without the other.
Methodology: Two-Layer Engineering Review
Inferara operates at the design stage: we evaluate architecture, execution semantics, and operational assumptions before complexity compounds.
Layer 1, System Evidence: Static code and architecture analysis
- Compiler-grade static analysis with rich AST modeling, linkage resolution, and type-aware reasoning.
- Data-flow and control-flow analysis adapted from mature engineering workflows to modern distributed and runtime-constrained systems.
- Inference-based formal modeling that enables theorem-prover-guided reasoning over complex system behavior and assumptions.
- Deep specialization in WebAssembly and low-level runtime constraints.
- AI-assisted correlation between source intent and bytecode reality to accelerate graph analysis and reduce false positives.
Layer 2, Strategic Insight: Design and systems-level analysis
Our team combines formal methods, programming languages, algorithms, and game theory to evaluate not only whether code is correct, but whether the system remains robust as real-world behavior diverges from ideal assumptions.
- Technical design quality validated with evidence from Layer 1 outputs.
- Mathematical soundness of mechanism design and critical system invariants.
- Behavioral scenario modeling across cooperative, competitive, and mixed-strategy environments.
Engagement Workflow
A concise consultancy workflow optimized for confidentiality, speed, and executive clarity.
- 01
Scope Alignment
We align goals, system boundaries, and constraints, then establish temporary read-only access when repository review is required.
- 02
Deep Analysis
We evaluate architecture, specifications, and code semantics through formal methods, static analysis, and model-driven reasoning.
- 03
Executive Report
You receive a decision-grade report with architectural findings, trade-off analysis, and prioritized engineering actions.
- 04
Access Revoked
Access is revoked immediately after engagement completion, preserving your IP and operational boundaries.
Where a review needs repository access, that access is read-only, time-boxed and revoked the day the engagement completes. We would rather ask for less and give you one fewer thing to worry about.
What we do not do
We do not issue security certificates or stamps of approval. We do not do penetration testing or run bug bounty programmes. We do not verify floating-point arithmetic or machine-learning models. We do not take on work we cannot staff properly, and we will tell you who would be doing your work before you commit to anything.
Why we work this way
The reason to do it this way is arithmetic. A review you buy repeatedly is a cost that never ends. An engagement that leaves your team able to write the next specification is a cost that does. We are not trying to become a permanent line in your budget, and the engagements that go best are the ones where the third quarter is smaller than the first.
If you don't do this design right from the beginning, then every piece of the code you write is a patch. And you start out from day 1 with a mess.
Tell us what has to be true.
If you are approaching a launch, a migration or a certification, send us the component and the properties that matter. The first conversation is about scope, and it is free.